Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video207.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Misha Vitels results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Halo Effect, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 49.5% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 231 faulty-reasoning hits from 207.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,217 of 28,364 speakers). This Misha Vitels is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Misha Vitels
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 207.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.9% percentile
38.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos207.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 49.5%49.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 26.0%26.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Loss Aversion: Speaker 49.5%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 6.7%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos