Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video35.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miriam Helfgott results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 98.1% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 95.89 faulty-reasoning hits from 35.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 48% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,403 of 28,364 speakers). This Miriam Helfgott is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Miriam Helfgott
Speaker details
Total words: 35.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
48.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos35.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 98.1%98.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 30.2%30.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.9%18.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 98.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos