Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video63 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ministry of Industry and Information Technology results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 320.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 63 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 67.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,029 of 28,364 speakers). This Ministry of Industry and Information Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Ministry of Industry and Information Technology
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 63
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
67.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos63 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos