Speaker summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos115.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ministry of Foreign Affairs results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 65.3% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 336.185 faulty-reasoning hits from 115.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 42.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,359 of 28,364 speakers). This Ministry of Foreign Affairs is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Speaker details
Total words: 115.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
42.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos115.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 65.3%65.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 58.5%58.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 55.3%55.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.5%18.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 65.3%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 58.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos