Speaker summary
⁠28%2 analyzed articles/videos79.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ministry of Defense results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Burden of Proof, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 138 faulty-reasoning hits from 79.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (22,060 of 28,364 speakers). This Ministry of Defense is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Ministry of Defense
Speaker details
Total words: 79.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.2% percentile
14.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos79.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.2%16.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos