Speaker summary
⁠25%4 analyzed articles/videos240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Milwaukee Journal Sentinel results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 124 faulty-reasoning hits from 240 analyzed words across 4 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,792 of 28,364 speakers). This Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Speaker details
Total words: 240
Content count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.0% percentile
4.5% BS Score4 analyzed videos240 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 4.4%4.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos