Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video59.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Milan Dennie results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 84% saturation with 59.613 hits. Analysis detected 254.613 faulty-reasoning hits from 59.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,232 of 28,364 speakers). This Milan Dennie is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Milan Dennie
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 59.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.0% percentile
50.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos59.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 84.0%84.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 51.9%51.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 52.8%52.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 32.1%32.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 84.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 52.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 51.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos