Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Oz results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Biased Writer Voice, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 270 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,805 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Oz is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Mike Oz
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510090.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos