Speaker summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos102.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Lavender results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 352 faulty-reasoning hits from 102.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 45% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,866 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Lavender is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Mike Lavender
Speaker details
Total words: 102.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
45.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos102.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos