Speaker summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Johnston results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 112 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,038 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Johnston is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Mike Johnston
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.0% percentile
35.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.5%16.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos