Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video73.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mika Presinski results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Begging the Question, and Appeal to Emotion, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 70.1% saturation with 59.92 hits. Analysis detected 217.84 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.667 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 70.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,821 of 28,364 speakers). This Mika Presinski is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Mika Presinski
Speaker details
Total words: 73.667
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.5% percentile
70.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 70.1%70.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 70.1%70.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.2%40.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 70.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 70.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos