Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miguel Chacon results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 70.606 hits. Analysis detected 445.374 faulty-reasoning hits from 374 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (24,347 of 28,364 speakers). This Miguel Chacon is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Miguel Chacon
Speaker details
Total words: 374
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.2% percentile
11.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos374 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.5%23.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.0%13.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos