Author summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 2,505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elida S. Perez results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 853 hits . Analysis detected 4,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,515 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,342 of 6,228 authors). This Elida S. Perez is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. Elida S. Perez
Author details
Total words: 7,515
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst