Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video186.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Micky Sharma results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 38.9% saturation with 66.209 hits. Analysis detected 350.209 faulty-reasoning hits from 186.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,269 of 28,364 speakers). This Micky Sharma is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Micky Sharma
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 186.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
16.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos186.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 39.0%39.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 14.4%14.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos