Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michio Kaku results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 116 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,786 of 28,364 speakers). This Michio Kaku is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
Michio Kaku
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠91%Michio Kaku (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 29
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510090.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos29 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos