Speaker summary
56%2 analyzed articles/videos75 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Immigrant Rights Center results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 69% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 207 faulty-reasoning hits from 75 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 34.5% and a BS Rank of 56% (19,412 of 43,495 speakers). This Michigan Immigrant Rights Center is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Michigan Immigrant Rights Center
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
56%Michigan Immigrant Rights Center (selected)35%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 75
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
34.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos75 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 69.0%69.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 38.0%38.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 19.0%19.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 69.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate