Speaker summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video110.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Trupiano results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Pessimism Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 173.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 110.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,600 of 28,364 speakers). This Michelle Trupiano is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Michelle Trupiano
Speaker details
Total words: 110.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510023.8% percentile
15.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos110.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos