Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video99.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Roland results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 83.7% saturation with 83.254 hits. Analysis detected 439.433 faulty-reasoning hits from 99.5 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 49.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (9,798 of 26,963 speakers). This Michelle Roland is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Michelle Roland
Speaker details
Total words: 99.5
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.7% percentile
49.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos99.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 88.3%88.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 83.7%83.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 55.2%55.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 56.0%56.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 63.7%63.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.3%16.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Begging the Question: Speaker 88.3%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 83.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 63.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 56.0%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 55.2%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 11.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos