Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michele Starostka results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 96% saturation with 53.77 hits. Analysis detected 165.917 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 77.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,240 of 28,364 speakers). This Michele Starostka is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Michele Starostka
Speaker details
Total words: 50
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
77.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos50 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 94.7%94.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 96.0%96.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 71.7%71.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 48.6%48.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 96.0%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 94.7%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 71.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 48.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos