Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Petuya results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 53.1% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 49 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,155 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Petuya is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Michael Petuya
Speaker details
Total words: 32
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
51.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos32 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 53.1%53.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 53.1%53.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 46.9%46.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 53.1%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 53.1%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 46.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos