Speaker summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Oren results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 62.7% saturation with 98.121 hits. Analysis detected 480.614 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,636 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Oren is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Michael Oren
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 156
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.4% percentile
30.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos156 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 62.6%62.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 62.7%62.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 62.0%62.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 18.4%18.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.6%19.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 62.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 62.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 62.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos