Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video40.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Johnson results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 61.4% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 203.446 faulty-reasoning hits from 40.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,376 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Michael Johnson
Speaker details
Total words: 40.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.4% percentile
37.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos40.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 84.7%84.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 61.4%61.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 30.7%30.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.3%19.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.3%19.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 84.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 61.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos