Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Intrator results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Begging the Question, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 43.2% saturation with 28.5 hits. Analysis detected 101.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,733 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Intrator is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Michael Intrator
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
25.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos