Speaker summary
47% 2 analyzed articles/videos 583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Farren results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 208.058 hits . Analysis detected 745.776 faulty-reasoning hits from 583 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 7% (25,937 of 27,797 speakers). This Michael Farren is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. Michael Farren
Speaker details
Total words: 583
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.7% percentile 7.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos583 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 34.5% 34.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 21.9% 21.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst