Speaker summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos174.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Bargury results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.5% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 582.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 174.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (23,950 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Bargury is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Michael Bargury
Speaker details
Total words: 174.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510015.6% percentile
11.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos174.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 18.2%18.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.5%29.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.2%14.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos