Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Baram results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 30.375 hits. Analysis detected 30.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,499 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Baram is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Michael Baram
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.6% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos