Speaker summary
⁠92%2 analyzed articles/videos43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These meteorologists results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Recency Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 74% saturation with 38.5 hits. Analysis detected 144.718 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 58% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,318 of 28,364 speakers). This meteorologists is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
meteorologists
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.2% percentile
58.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos43 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 68.0%68.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 74.0%74.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 51.9%51.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 48.1%48.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 48.1%48.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 74.0%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 68.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 51.9%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos