Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meredith Trainor results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 65.8% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 275 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,797 of 28,364 speakers). This Meredith Trainor is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Meredith Trainor
Speaker details
Total words: 62
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.9% percentile
45.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos62 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 60.7%60.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 65.8%65.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 65.8%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 60.7%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 0.4%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos