Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mehwish Nisar, MD, PhD, AFHEA results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 1,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 969 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,042 of 28,364 speakers). This Mehwish Nisar, MD, PhD, AFHEA is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group.
Mehwish Nisar, MD, PhD, AFHEA
Speaker details
Total words: 969
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751004.7% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos969 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.8%4.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 8.1%8.1%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos