Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video33.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mehdi Tabatabaei results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37.5 hits. Analysis detected 112.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 33.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,748 of 28,364 speakers). This Mehdi Tabatabaei is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Mehdi Tabatabaei
Speaker details
Total words: 33.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos33.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos