Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video93.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meghan Hughes results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 484.653 faulty-reasoning hits from 93.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,419 of 28,364 speakers). This Meghan Hughes is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Meghan Hughes
Speaker details
Total words: 93.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
42.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos93.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 51.2%51.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 64.6%64.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 58.6%58.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 29.3%29.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 29.3%29.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 45.7%45.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 20.7%20.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 64.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 58.6%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 51.2%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 45.7%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos