Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video426.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mea Stone results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 174 hits. Analysis detected 781.371 faulty-reasoning hits from 426.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,688 of 28,364 speakers). This Mea Stone is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Mea Stone
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 426.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.4% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos426.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos