Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elina Shirazi results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 765 hits . Analysis detected 9,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,728 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,036 of 6,172 authors). This Elina Shirazi is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group. Elina Shirazi
Author details
Total words: 8,728
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst