Speaker summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video261.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maz Naba results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 286 faulty-reasoning hits from 261.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (26,028 of 28,364 speakers). This Maz Naba is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group.
Maz Naba
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 261.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751008.2% percentile
8.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos261.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.1%8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 20.9%20.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos