Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Max Boot results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 40.8% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 335.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 147 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (16,810 of 27,476 speakers). This Max Boot is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Max Boot
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 147
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
24.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos147 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.2%36.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.8%40.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.9%19.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.7%10.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.8%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 36.2%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos