Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video86 analyzed words
BS Summary: These @mattvanswol results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 90.7% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 279 faulty-reasoning hits from 86 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 64.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,467 of 28,364 speakers). This @mattvanswol is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
@mattvanswol
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠78%@mattvanswol (selected)65%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 86
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
64.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos86 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 90.7%90.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 90.7%90.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 52.3%52.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 52.3%52.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 38.4%38.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 90.7%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 90.7%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 52.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 52.3%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos