Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Quinn results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Pessimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 51.7% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 74.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (14,148 of 28,364 speakers). This Matthew Quinn is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Matthew Quinn
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠51%Matthew Quinn (selected)33%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.1% percentile
32.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 35.3%35.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 32.8%32.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos