Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Miller results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 193.172 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,710 of 28,364 speakers). This Matthew Miller is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Matthew Miller
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.8% percentile
54.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 84.5%84.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 67.2%67.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 31.0%31.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 84.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 67.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 0.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 9.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos