Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Cody Nitschke results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Burden of Proof, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 246 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,971 of 28,364 speakers). This Matthew Cody Nitschke is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Matthew Cody Nitschke
Speaker details
Total words: 72
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
68.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos72 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos