Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matteo Renzi results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 257.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,317 of 28,364 speakers). This Matteo Renzi is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Matteo Renzi
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
38.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 54.9%54.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 45.1%45.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 54.9%54.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 27.4%27.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 27.4%27.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 22.6%22.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 45.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 5.2%Primacy Effect: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos