Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Rosman results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 1,342 hits . Analysis detected 9,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,289 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,817 of 6,629 authors). This Rebecca Rosman is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Rebecca Rosman
Author details
Total words: 6,289
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.7% 19.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.4% 8.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst