Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Yarnell results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Begging the Question, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 400.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,506 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Yarnell is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Matt Yarnell
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
37.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos