Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video61.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Woods results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 87 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,309 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Woods is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Matt Woods
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠57%Matt Woods (selected)39%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 61.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
38.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos61.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.2%38.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos