Speaker summary
⁠48%2 analyzed articles/videos46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Goodwin results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Appeal to Emotion, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 39.4% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 118 faulty-reasoning hits from 46 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,104 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Goodwin is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Matt Goodwin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 46
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
22.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos46 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos