Speaker summary
⁠41%3 analyzed articles/videos64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Brittin results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.3% saturation with 21.431 hits. Analysis detected 126.431 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,349 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Brittin is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Matt Brittin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
28.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.2%38.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos