Speaker summary
82% 5 analyzed articles/videos 393.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mary Bruce results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 134.923 hits . Analysis detected 1,321.788 faulty-reasoning hits from 393.667 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 8% (24,946 of 26,841 speakers). This Mary Bruce is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group. Mary Bruce
Speaker details
Total words: 393.667
Content count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.1% percentile 7.9% BS Score5 analyzed videos393.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 34.3% 34.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Tu Quoque: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst