ABC News99%

Former U.S. Olympian charged with vandalism of Reflecting Pool69%

7/2/2026, 5:22:03 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 52.1% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 1,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 369 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (6,826 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the video peer group.

Former U.S. Olympian charged with vandalism of Reflecting Pool 
The Justice Department now charging a former American Olympian for damaging the reflecting pool in Washington. 
President Trump spent $16 million in taxpayer money to paint and renovate the pool. 
He blamed vandals for the algae and peeling paint. 
Now that former Olympian has been charged and tonight he says he did nothing wrong. 
Here's Mary Bruce. 
>> Tonight the Justice Department bringing felony charges against former American Olympian David Hearn, accusing him of damaging the reflecting pool two weeks after he was arrested [clears throat] on the National Mall. 
President Trump spent $16 million in taxpayer money to refurbish the pool, but just one week later it turned green with algae. 
Parts of its freshly painted bottom rising to the surface. 
Trump blamed vandals, not his handpicked contractors. 
>> They put a big gash 350 ft long, think of that. 350 ft gash. 
>> Today US Attorney Jeanine Pirro accusing Hearn of damaging approximately 2 square feet. 
>> The National Park Service employees observed Hearn actually forcefully and violently pulling up and removing the bottom liner with both hands. 
>> President Trump claims the alleged vandals used box cutters. 
>> They came in with box cutters and they cut it up. 
>> Today reporters asking what Hearn allegedly used. 
>> Did he have any tools or was it just his bare hands? 
>> Uh right now we believe it's his bare hands, both hands. 
>> So does that indicate in your belief that it was probably damaged before or 
do you believe that he 
>> Oh, he damaged it. 
>> Further, but do you believe that it had already been damaged before? 
>> He damaged the pool. 
>> Hearn told ABC News he was biking near the pool when he saw a piece of loose paint in the water and reached out and touched the end. 
He insists he's no vandal, just a curious concerned citizen. 
>> And David, in a statement tonight Hearn's attorneys insist he is innocent 
and say, "Quote, these charges are outrageous and should be alarming to every American adding this indictment reflects the administration's effort to shift blame for their own failures." 
David. 
>> Mary Bruce live at the White House. 
Thanks, Mary. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.7%ABC News: 2.2%Confirmation Bias16.7%This article: 28.8%ABC News: 0.7%Anchoring Bias28.8%This article: 33.1%ABC News: 3.0%Availability Heuristic33.1%This article: 5.8%ABC News: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%ABC News: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias5.8%This article: 17.5%ABC News: 6.8%Framing Effect17.5%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.7%ABC News: 2.4%Optimism Bias7.7%This article: 2.6%ABC News: 1.0%Pessimism Bias2.6%This article: 52.1%ABC News: 7.7%Negativity Bias52.1%This article: 6.1%ABC News: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias6.1%This article: 4.2%ABC News: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error4.2%This article: 6.6%ABC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%ABC News: 2.2%Halo Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%ABC News: 1.3%Recency Bias2.1%This article: 15.3%ABC News: 0.4%Primacy Effect15.3%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 27.2%ABC News: 3.3%Appeal to Authority27.2%This article: 5.3%ABC News: 0.9%False Dilemma5.3%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.3%ABC News: 2.8%Hasty Generalization6.3%This article: 2.1%ABC News: 0.4%Red Herring2.1%This article: 11.6%ABC News: 0.4%Bandwagon11.6%This article: 34.4%ABC News: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion34.4%This article: 16.7%ABC News: 0.7%Begging the Question16.7%This article: 16.9%ABC News: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.9%This article: 4.2%ABC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque4.2%This article: 36.2%ABC News: 0.4%Burden of Proof36.2%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 17.5%ABC News: 1.2%Anecdotal17.5%This article: 2.6%ABC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.6%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.0%ABC News: 0.0%Middle Ground4.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

378 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers33%attributed speech252writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJeanine Pirro • 14 words • 0.0% coverageNational Park Service • 22 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Trump • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageHearn • 29 words • 0.0% coverageHearn • 10 words • 0.0% coverageHearn's attorneys • 13 words • 0.0% coverageHearn's attorneys • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hearn's attorneys

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words33% of attributed speech97% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.