Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hearn's attorneys results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Genetic Fallacy, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 56 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,776 of 28,364 speakers). This Hearn's attorneys is worse (more manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Hearn's attorneys
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510093.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos