Speaker summary
⁠78%5 analyzed articles/videos123.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mary results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 46.9% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 379.975 faulty-reasoning hits from 123.667 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 15% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (22,043 of 28,364 speakers). This Mary is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Mary
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 123.667
Content count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.3% percentile
15.0% BS Score5 analyzed videos123.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 46.9%46.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.9%17.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 46.9%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos