Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video190.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martha Raddatz results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 68.729 hits. Analysis detected 636.379 faulty-reasoning hits from 190.667 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 17.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,625 of 28,364 speakers). This Martha Raddatz is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Martha Raddatz
Speaker details
Total words: 190.667
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.3% percentile
17.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos190.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 18.7%18.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.1%31.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 7.5%Red Herring: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos